U.S. Spotlight Index

Global Index

India Spotlight Index

Global Index 2018

General Mills

Corporate Profile

11 (2013)

Corporate Profile

A Governance (12.5%)
B Products (25%)
C Accessibility (20%)
D Marketing (20%)
E Lifestyles (2.5%)
F Labeling (15%)
G Engagement (5%)
Highest score among rated companies
The percentages in parentheses indicate the weight assigned to each Category
Market capitalization
$32,814 m
# of employees
Total revenues*
$17,642 m
Reported product categories
Bakery; Canned/ Preserved Food; Chilled, Dried and Frozen Processed Food; Confectionery; Dairy; Ice Cream; Meal Replacement; Noodles; Pasta; Ready Meals; Sauces, Dressings and Condiments; Snack Bars; Soup; Spreads; Savoury Snacks; Concentrates
Reported revenue by geography**
United States 70%, Rest of the world 30%
* Source: Capital IQ, USD exchange rate as of 31 Dec 2014 ** Source: Capital IQ

Other Indexes

Nutrition general




Corporate Profile

  • Governance

    Overall scores
    Rank 17
    Scores per criterion
    Criterion Absolute score Weighted score
    Strategy 1.625 0.541125
    Management 1.656 0.551448
    Reporting 2.813 0.936729
    Average scores
    Lowest 0
    Average 3.5622272727273
    Highest 8.731
  • Products

    Overall scores
    Rank 12
    Scores per criterion
    Criterion Absolute score Weighted score
    Formulation 1.734 0.867
    Profiling 2.813 1.4065
    Average scores
    Lowest 0
    Average 2.7987727272727
    Highest 8.427
  • Accessibility

    Overall scores
    Rank 15
    Scores per criterion
    Criterion Absolute score Weighted score
    Pricing 0 0
    Distribution 0 0
    Average scores
    Lowest 0
    Average 1.1542272727273
    Highest 6.68
  • Marketing

    Overall scores
    Rank 5
    Scores per criterion
    Criterion Absolute score Weighted score
    Policy (all) 9 2.25
    Compliance (all) 4.167 1.04175
    Policy (children) 6.842 1.7105
    Compliance (children) 5.555 1.38875
    Average scores
    Lowest 0
    Average 3.7889090909091
    Highest 8.539
  • Lifestyles

    Overall scores
    Rank 5
    Scores per criterion
    Criterion Absolute score Weighted score
    Employees 4.958 1.651014
    Breastfeeding 4.922 1.639026
    Consumers 2.005 0.667665
    Average scores
    Lowest 0
    Average 2.4945
    Highest 7.072
  • Labeling

    Overall scores
    Rank 14
    Scores per criterion
    Criterion Absolute score Weighted score
    Facts 2.169 1.0845
    Claims 0.176 0.088
    Average scores
    Lowest 0
    Average 2.3608181818182
    Highest 6.22
  • Engagement

    Overall scores
    Rank 12
    Scores per criterion
    Criterion Absolute score Weighted score
    Lobbying 2.813 1.4065
    Stakeholder 2.344 1.172
    Average scores
    Lowest 0
    Average 2.7793636363636
    Highest 6.25

Areas of strength

- The company participated in the ATNI research process and provided additional information upon request. This is an improvement from 2013 when the assessment had to be conducted using only information publicly available and led to a higher ranking in four out of the seven categories (D, E, F, and G).
- Similar to the first Index, General Mills’ nutrition programs are subject to executive oversight via its Board-level Public Responsibility Committee, and overall nutrition responsibility is allocated to the CEO.
- General Mills shows continued improvement in the nutritional quality of its product portfolio. It now reports that 76% of its products have been nutritionally improved since 2005, up from 64% as reported in the first index.
- General Mills supports the health and wellness of employees through a comprehensive suite of initiatives. These include on-site gyms and nutrition consultations, addressing health through both diet and lifestyle changes.

Areas for improvement

- General Mills’ Health Metric product reformulation system enables products to be included in the company’s health metric achievement list when reductions are made in one of a variety of negative nutrients. This does not equate however to a product meeting a composite healthy threshold.
- Similar to 2013, the reformulation system appears to be confined to U.S. markets, despite the fact that the company generates 33% of its revenues in other markets. A best-practice approach to reformulation would establish absolute minimum/maximum thresholds for each key nutrient, by product category or sub-category, across the group-wide portfolio and in all markets, and would calculate the overall nutritional quality of each product.
- Undernutrition-related disclosure remains limited. The company contributes to the philanthropic industry organization Partners in Food Solutions (PFS), which helps to address micronutrient deficiency in Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania, Malawi and Zambia. Similar to 2013, there is however little reporting on General Mills’ own commercial undernutrition initiatives. Many products are nutrient-enriched, but there is no evidence that such enrichment is designed and targeted to specific undernourished groups.
- Although the company participates in philanthropic initiatives in certain higher-priority developing countries, it does not make any specific commitment to focus its undernutrition efforts in these locations.
- General Mills’ ranking in the 2013 and 2016 Global Indexes remains the same. Although the company provided additional information through its engagement with the Access to Nutrition Foundation (ATNF), the company still lags leading practice. This shows there is substantial room for improvement in many areas.

Improving nutrition for all

The Access to Nutrition Index rates food and beverage manufacturers´ nutrition-related policies, practices and disclosures worldwide on a recurring basis.


Access to Nutrition Foundation
Arthur van Schendelstraat 650
3511 MJ Utrecht
The Netherlands
+31 (0)30 410 09 16



Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

© Copyright Access to Nutrition Foundation. All rights reserved. | Disclaimer | Legal | Privacy policy