The overall ATNI ranking shows companies' performance across all Categories of the methodology in the context of both obesity and diet-related chronic diseases and undernutrition. Companies with very low scores make little if any information about their nutrition practices publicly available and had minimal or no engagement in the research process.
| 1 | Danone |
|
6.3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Unilever |
|
6.1 |
| 3 | Nestlé |
|
6.0 |
| 4 | PepsiCo |
|
4.4 |
| 5 | Kraft Foods Inc. |
|
3.7 |
| 6 | Grupo Bimbo |
|
3.0 |
| 7 | ConAgra Foods |
|
2.8 |
| 8 | Heinz |
|
2.7 |
| 9 | Coca-Cola |
|
2.6 |
| 10 | Kellogg |
|
2.5 |
| 11 | General Mills |
|
2.2 |
| 12 | Barilla |
|
1.9 |
| 12 | Campbell |
|
1.9 |
| 14 | Ferrero |
|
1.8 |
| 14 | Sigma |
|
1.8 |
| 16 | Mars |
|
1.6 |
| 17 | Ajinomoto |
|
1.4 |
| 18 | Hershey |
|
1.3 |
| 19 | FrieslandCampina |
|
1.2 |
| 20 | Brasil Foods |
|
0.6 |
| 21 | Nichirei |
|
0.1 |
| 22 | Lactalis |
|
0.0 |
| 22 | Lotte |
|
0.0 |
| 22 | Nissin |
|
0.0 |
| 22 | Tingyi |
|
0.0 |
A company can better sustain and scale up nutrition activities when a commitment to the issue starts at the top of the organization and is integrated into its core business strategy. Nutrition issues are then more likely to be prioritized as the company allocates resources, tracks performance, and reports to its stakeholders.
This Category assesses the extent to which a company's corporate strategy includes a specific commitment to improving nutrition and whether its approach is embedded within its governance and management systems, as evaluated using three Criteria:
The weight of this Category is 12.5% of the overall score.
Read more about this Category, including the key findings and recommendations, here
| 1 | Nestlé |
|
9.3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Danone |
|
8.6 |
| 3 | Unilever |
|
8.5 |
| 4 | PepsiCo |
|
7.7 |
| 5 | Grupo Bimbo |
|
5.5 |
| 6 | General Mills |
|
5.4 |
| 7 | Campbell |
|
5.3 |
| 8 | Kraft Foods Inc. |
|
5.2 |
| 9 | Coca-Cola |
|
5.1 |
| 10 | FrieslandCampina |
|
4.9 |
| 11 | ConAgra Foods |
|
4.7 |
| 12 | Kellogg |
|
4.6 |
| 13 | Ferrero |
|
4.0 |
| 14 | Ajinomoto |
|
3.9 |
| 15 | Heinz |
|
3.6 |
| 16 | Barilla |
|
3.0 |
| 17 | Hershey |
|
2.8 |
| 18 | Mars |
|
2.4 |
| 19 | Sigma |
|
2.0 |
| 20 | Brasil Foods |
|
1.4 |
| 21 | Lotte |
|
0.2 |
| 22 | Lactalis |
|
0.0 |
| 22 | Nichirei |
|
0.0 |
| 22 | Nissin |
|
0.0 |
| 22 | Tingyi |
|
0.0 |
Companies can help consumers make healthier choices by improving the nutritional quality of foods made available to them. This Category addresses companies' efforts to do so through research and development (R&D), new product formulation and reformulation of existing products. It also assesses the quality of the nutrient profiling system that a company may use to guide its product formulation efforts.
This Category consists of two Criteria:
The weight of this Category is 25% of the overall score.
Read more about this Category, including the key findings and recommendations, here
| 1 | Unilever |
|
7.7 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Nestlé |
|
7.3 |
| 3 | Danone |
|
7.0 |
| 4 | Grupo Bimbo |
|
5.7 |
| 4 | Heinz |
|
5.7 |
| 6 | PepsiCo |
|
5.0 |
| 7 | Kellogg |
|
3.9 |
| 8 | Barilla |
|
3.5 |
| 9 | ConAgra Foods |
|
3.2 |
| 10 | Kraft Foods Inc. |
|
2.6 |
| 11 | General Mills |
|
2.5 |
| 12 | Sigma |
|
2.0 |
| 13 | Campbell |
|
1.5 |
| 14 | Mars |
|
1.0 |
| 15 | Coca-Cola |
|
0.9 |
| 16 | Ferrero |
|
0.8 |
| 17 | Brasil Foods |
|
0.7 |
| 18 | FrieslandCampina |
|
0.6 |
| 19 | Hershey |
|
0.5 |
| 20 | Ajinomoto |
|
0.4 |
| 21 | Nichirei |
|
0.1 |
| 22 | Lactalis |
|
0.0 |
| 22 | Lotte |
|
0.0 |
| 22 | Nissin |
|
0.0 |
| 22 | Tingyi |
|
0.0 |
Producing healthier options is a necessary but insufficient condition to improve consumer access to nutritious foods and beverages. Consumers also need to have access to these products. Companies should offer them at competitive prices and distribute them widely to offer consumers a "level playing field" between healthy and less healthy options.
This Category assesses companies' efforts to make their healthy products more accessible through their approaches to pricing and distribution. It consists of two Criteria:
The weight of this Category is 20% of the overall score.
Read more about this Category, including the key findings and recommendations, here
| 1 | Danone |
|
7.7 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Nestlé |
|
7.1 |
| 3 | Unilever |
|
6.5 |
| 4 | PepsiCo |
|
2.7 |
| 5 | Kraft Foods Inc. |
|
2.0 |
| 6 | Sigma |
|
1.3 |
| 7 | Coca-Cola |
|
0.9 |
| 7 | ConAgra Foods |
|
0.9 |
| 9 | Ajinomoto |
|
0.0 |
| 9 | Barilla |
|
0.0 |
| 9 | Brasil Foods |
|
0.0 |
| 9 | Campbell |
|
0.0 |
| 9 | Ferrero |
|
0.0 |
| 9 | FrieslandCampina |
|
0.0 |
| 9 | General Mills |
|
0.0 |
| 9 | Grupo Bimbo |
|
0.0 |
| 9 | Heinz |
|
0.0 |
| 9 | Hershey |
|
0.0 |
| 9 | Kellogg |
|
0.0 |
| 9 | Lactalis |
|
0.0 |
| 9 | Lotte |
|
0.0 |
| 9 | Mars |
|
0.0 |
| 9 | Nichirei |
|
0.0 |
| 9 | Nissin |
|
0.0 |
| 9 | Tingyi |
|
0.0 |
This Category captures the extent to which companies support consumers in making healthy choices by adopting responsible marketing practices and by prioritizing the marketing of their healthier products.
The Category consists of two parallel groups of three Criteria:
These two groups of Criteria are treated separately in the following discussion.
The weight of this Category is 20% of the overall score.
Read more about this Category, including the key findings and recommendations, here
| 1 | Danone |
|
5.2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Unilever |
|
4.8 |
| 3 | PepsiCo |
|
4.6 |
| 4 | Kraft Foods Inc. |
|
4.4 |
| 5 | Coca-Cola |
|
4.1 |
| 6 | Nestlé |
|
4.0 |
| 7 | Mars |
|
3.5 |
| 8 | Ferrero |
|
3.4 |
| 8 | General Mills |
|
3.4 |
| 10 | ConAgra Foods |
|
3.3 |
| 11 | Hershey |
|
2.7 |
| 11 | Kellogg |
|
2.7 |
| 13 | Campbell |
|
2.5 |
| 13 | Grupo Bimbo |
|
2.5 |
| 15 | Barilla |
|
2.1 |
| 15 | Heinz |
|
2.1 |
| 17 | FrieslandCampina |
|
1.5 |
| 18 | Sigma |
|
0.8 |
| 19 | Ajinomoto |
|
0.4 |
| 20 | Brasil Foods |
|
0.3 |
| 20 | Nichirei |
|
0.3 |
| 22 | Lactalis |
|
0.0 |
| 22 | Lotte |
|
0.0 |
| 22 | Nissin |
|
0.0 |
| 22 | Tingyi |
|
0.0 |
Companies can support healthy diets and active lifestyles for their own staff by providing employee health and wellness programs. In addition to other benefits, these programs can help facilitate a company culture which contributes to a greater focus on improving the company's nutrition practices. Companies can also help a broader audience to adopt healthy diets and active lifestyles through support for education programs geared towards consumers.
This Category assesses the extent to which companies support such efforts through two Criteria:
The weight of this Category is 2.5% of the overall score.
Read more about this Category, including the key findings and recommendations, here
| 1 | Unilever |
|
8.4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | PepsiCo |
|
7.2 |
| 3 | Coca-Cola |
|
6.6 |
| 4 | Kraft Foods Inc. |
|
5.9 |
| 5 | Nestlé |
|
5.1 |
| 6 | Ajinomoto |
|
5.0 |
| 6 | Danone |
|
5.0 |
| 8 | Heinz |
|
4.7 |
| 9 | ConAgra Foods |
|
4.3 |
| 10 | Campbell |
|
3.7 |
| 11 | Barilla |
|
3.2 |
| 11 | Hershey |
|
3.2 |
| 13 | Sigma |
|
3.1 |
| 14 | Grupo Bimbo |
|
2.9 |
| 15 | Kellogg |
|
2.6 |
| 16 | General Mills |
|
2.5 |
| 17 | Ferrero |
|
2.3 |
| 17 | Mars |
|
2.3 |
| 19 | Nichirei |
|
1.0 |
| 20 | Brasil Foods |
|
0.0 |
| 20 | FrieslandCampina |
|
0.0 |
| 20 | Lactalis |
|
0.0 |
| 20 | Lotte |
|
0.0 |
| 20 | Nissin |
|
0.0 |
| 20 | Tingyi |
|
0.0 |
One important means of addressing obesity and undernutrition is to provide consumers with accurate, comprehensive and readily understandable information about the nutritional composition and potential health benefits of what they eat. This can promote better nutrition by helping consumers choose appropriate products to manage their weight and help to prevent or address diet-related chronic disease, as well as raise awareness of products that will address micronutrient deficiencies.
This Category assesses companies' approaches to product labeling and use of health and nutrition claims, particularly with respect to the consistency of their application across product portfolios and in different markets and their accordance with international standards. This assessment is divided into two Criteria:
The weight of this Category is 15% of the overall score.
Read more about this Category, including the key findings and recommendations, here
| 1 | Kraft Foods Inc. |
|
4.1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Sigma |
|
3.3 |
| 3 | Ajinomoto |
|
2.9 |
| 3 | Danone |
|
2.9 |
| 5 | Nestlé |
|
2.3 |
| 6 | Coca-Cola |
|
1.6 |
| 6 | Unilever |
|
1.6 |
| 8 | ConAgra Foods |
|
1.5 |
| 9 | Mars |
|
1.4 |
| 10 | PepsiCo |
|
1.3 |
| 11 | Ferrero |
|
1.1 |
| 11 | Kellogg |
|
1.1 |
| 13 | Brasil Foods |
|
0.9 |
| 13 | Campbell |
|
0.9 |
| 15 | Grupo Bimbo |
|
0.8 |
| 16 | Barilla |
|
0.5 |
| 16 | Heinz |
|
0.5 |
| 18 | General Mills |
|
0.3 |
| 19 | FrieslandCampina |
|
0.1 |
| 19 | Hershey |
|
0.1 |
| 19 | Nichirei |
|
0.1 |
| 22 | Lactalis |
|
0.0 |
| 22 | Lotte |
|
0.0 |
| 22 | Nissin |
|
0.0 |
| 22 | Tingyi |
|
0.0 |
Companies can have an impact on consumer access to nutrition by influencing governments and policymakers through lobbying activities, political contributions and positions on nutrition policies. In addition, constructive engagement by companies with a wide range of other stakeholders (including international organizations, civil society, and academics) can help to inform companies' approaches to nutrition.
This Category focuses on companies' engagement with stakeholders on corporate nutrition practices and nutrition-related issues. Companies are assessed under two Criteria:
The weight of this Category is 5% of the overall score.
Read more about this Category, including the key findings and recommendations, here
| 1 | Danone |
|
7.1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nestlé |
|
7.1 |
| 1 | Unilever |
|
7.1 |
| 4 | Kraft Foods Inc. |
|
6.7 |
| 5 | PepsiCo |
|
6.5 |
| 6 | Coca-Cola |
|
6.3 |
| 7 | ConAgra Foods |
|
5.6 |
| 8 | Grupo Bimbo |
|
4.3 |
| 8 | Heinz |
|
4.3 |
| 10 | Kellogg |
|
4.2 |
| 11 | Ajinomoto |
|
3.5 |
| 12 | Ferrero |
|
3.3 |
| 13 | Hershey |
|
3.2 |
| 14 | Campbell |
|
3.1 |
| 14 | General Mills |
|
3.1 |
| 16 | FrieslandCampina |
|
2.0 |
| 17 | Brasil Foods |
|
1.8 |
| 18 | Mars |
|
1.3 |
| 19 | Barilla |
|
1.1 |
| 20 | Sigma |
|
0.8 |
| 21 | Lactalis |
|
0.0 |
| 21 | Lotte |
|
0.0 |
| 21 | Nichirei |
|
0.0 |
| 21 | Nissin |
|
0.0 |
| 21 | Tingyi |
|
0.0 |
The sub-ranking for obesity reflects companies' efforts to deliver healthy food choices and responsibly influence consumer behavior.
| 1 | Danone |
|
6.3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Nestlé |
|
6.0 |
| 3 | Unilever |
|
5.9 |
| 4 | PepsiCo |
|
4.2 |
| 5 | Kraft Foods Inc. |
|
3.5 |
| 6 | Grupo Bimbo |
|
3.2 |
| 7 | ConAgra Foods |
|
2.8 |
| 7 | Kellogg |
|
2.8 |
| 9 | Heinz |
|
2.7 |
| 10 | General Mills |
|
2.4 |
| 11 | Coca-Cola |
|
2.3 |
| 12 | Campbell |
|
2.2 |
| 13 | Barilla |
|
2.1 |
| 13 | Sigma |
|
2.1 |
| 15 | Ferrero |
|
1.8 |
| 16 | Mars |
|
1.7 |
| 17 | Ajinomoto |
|
1.3 |
| 17 | FrieslandCampina |
|
1.3 |
| 17 | Hershey |
|
1.3 |
| 20 | Brasil Foods |
|
0.8 |
| 21 | Nichirei |
|
0.2 |
| 22 | Lactalis |
|
0.0 |
| 22 | Lotte |
|
0.0 |
| 22 | Nissin |
|
0.0 |
| 22 | Tingyi |
|
0.0 |
The sub-ranking for undernutrition reflects additional actions which companies can take specific to addressing undernutrition, including the fortification of products with micronutrients otherwise deficient in the diet.
| 1 | Unilever |
|
5.4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Danone |
|
5.3 |
| 2 | Nestlé |
|
5.3 |
| 4 | PepsiCo |
|
4.1 |
| 5 | Kraft Foods Inc. |
|
3.1 |
| 6 | Coca-Cola |
|
2.9 |
| 7 | Ajinomoto |
|
2.1 |
| 8 | Grupo Bimbo |
|
1.8 |
| 9 | Heinz |
|
1.4 |
| 10 | Kellogg |
|
0.8 |
| 11 | FrieslandCampina |
|
0.7 |
| 12 | General Mills |
|
0.5 |
| 13 | Mars |
|
0.3 |
| 14 | Barilla |
|
0.0 |
| 14 | Brasil Foods |
|
0.0 |
| 14 | Campbell |
|
0.0 |
| 14 | Lactalis |
|
0.0 |
| 14 | Lotte |
|
0.0 |
| 14 | Nichirei |
|
0.0 |
| 14 | Nissin |
|
0.0 |
| 14 | Sigma |
|
0.0 |
| 14 | Tingyi |
|
0.0 |